Submission on

The Term of Parliament (Enabling 4-year Term) Legislation Amendment Bill

(Government Bill 128—1)

From: Ukes Baha | 29 March 2025

Introduction

The Term of Parliament (Enabling 4-year Term) Legislation Amendment Bill (128-1) represents an unacceptable threat to New Zealand’s democratic principles and must be rejected in full.

Our 3-year parliamentary term has long protected democratic accountability, allowing voters to frequently assess their representatives’ performance. This Bill undermines those protections by enabling the sitting Prime Minister to extend their own time in power, thereby eroding oversight and threatening the constitutional balance.

1. Frequent Elections Are Essential to Prevent Government Overreach

Frequent elections are a core check on executive power.

The claim that a longer term improves governance is unsubstantiated.

New Zealand’s term length is internationally reasonable.

2. Clause 5(2) Hands Election Control to the Prime Minister

This clause permits the Prime Minister to choose between a 3- or 4-year term by proclamation.

Recommended Action: Remove Clause 5(2) entirely. The term of Parliament should remain fixed and beyond the government’s control.

3. Clause 2(3): The Referendum is Misleading

The proposed referendum wording obscures the real implications.

Recommended Action: Remove Clause 2(3). A referendum under misleading terms is unacceptable. No change to the term length should be pursued without full clarity and direct public approval.

4. Clause 8: Entrenchment is Unjustified

Entrenching a controversial and untested provision is inappropriate.

Recommended Action: Remove Clause 8. Entrenchment is only suitable for fundamental democratic principles—not experimental reforms.

Conclusion: Reject the Bill in Its Entirety

This Bill threatens New Zealand’s proud tradition of democratic accountability. It reduces voter oversight, concentrates power in the hands of the Prime Minister, and introduces a referendum process that obscures the reality of the proposed change.

The current 3-year term is not broken. It is a vital safeguard that keeps our democracy strong, nimble, and responsive. There is no legitimate justification for tampering with this cornerstone of our system.

Parliament must reject this Bill to protect the democratic integrity of Aotearoa New Zealand.