Opposing the Plain Language Act Repeal

This page is a quiet stand — not against complexity, but against confusion used as a shield. It shares what the repeal quietly removes, why that matters, and how clarity itself is worth protecting.

What the Repeal Quietly Removes

Why It Matters for Everyone

Who Is Behind the Repeal

Judith Collins, Attorney-General and Minister for Defence, proposed the repeal. Her record is one of power consolidation, not public inclusion:

This repeal fits that pattern: the less the public can understand, the more power is kept where it already sits.

If This Page Speaks to You

This page isn’t loud. It’s just clear. The Plain Language Act wasn’t a perfect tool — but it was a good one. Removing it is a step away from public participation, and a step toward quiet confusion.

If you believe rights should be understood — not hidden — you are welcome to oppose the repeal. Gently, sincerely, in your own voice.

"Language is power. When clarity is lost, so is trust. This repeal is not reform — it’s erasure of public voice." — Ukes Baha
🔙 Back to APIAPE Index